A digital rental that leads back to the cinema
In his interview published on 1 May 2019, Philipp explains the model behind Kino on Demand: after watching five films on the service, a viewer would receive a five-euro voucher for a participating local cinema. The idea was to connect home viewing with the theatrical experience, rather than treat them as isolated customer relationships.
Listen for who benefits at each step—the viewer, cinema, rights holder and platform—and how the model links their incentives. Read Philipp’s explanation of the cinema and VOD model. The interview describes the proposal at that time; it is not a statement of the service’s current offer.
When should a film move to its next window?
Philipp contrasts fixed release plans with the more flexible approach he expected to emerge. In his account, a film’s performance across locations and audiences could help a distributor decide whether to move into home entertainment sooner or give the theatrical release more time. This was his forecast in 2019, not a claim that every market now works that way.
Follow the discussion of release windows and audience data. His reasoning connects the timing decision to information about who actually watches, while acknowledging limits on access to personal and payment data.
Separate audience reach from payment timing
A distribution strategy answers how a film reaches viewers. A financing plan also has to account for when the producer gets paid. The production-banking guide takes up that second question through Lorraine Ruckstuhl’s discussion of streamer receivables.
Read the history behind the economics
The Media CFO review of The Hollywood Economist 2.0 offers a companion route into studio economics and revenue beyond public box-office numbers. Read its treatment of earlier business models in its historical context. For a broader selection, explore the film-finance reading list.



